Election 2008 2008

« Conservative Counties Reporting on 8, But L.A. and S.F. to Come | Main | Time For Some Good News... »

November 05, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341ca4b653ef010535da29c0970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Same-Sex Marriage Dead in Arizona:

Comments

Norris Hall


Rather than waste 20 million dollars to support a ban on Gay marriage why doesn’t the Mormon church do something useful like spend it to feed the poor or provide shelter for the homeless. There are so many good uses for that money.

What kind of Christian message does it send when you spend that kind of money on political campaigns while the poor go hungry and the sick can't afford to see a doctor.

Handing 20 million dollars over to television stations for anti gay ads is a big waste of money in a world of suffering.

Besides...I'm sure 20 years from now the Mormons will get another revelation that God finally OK's gay marriages.

Norris Hall


Rather than waste 20 million dollars to support a ban on Gay marriage why doesn’t the Mormon church do something useful like spend it to feed the poor or provide shelter for the homeless. There are so many good uses for that money.

What kind of Christian message does it send when you spend that kind of money on political campaigns while the poor go hungry and the sick can't afford to see a doctor.

Handing 20 million dollars over to television stations for anti gay ads is a big waste of money in a world of suffering.

Besides...I'm sure 20 years from now the Mormons will get another revelation that God finally OK's gay marriages.

ltbugaf

Norris, there are so many falsehoods here I really wonder where to begin:

1. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints didn't hand over 20 million dollars for this campaign. Private contributors, many of whom were members of that church and many of whom were not, made the individual choice to give that money.

2. The Church does spend large amounts of money on feeding the poor and housing the homeless. If you're unaware of this, you clearly haven't spent so much as 60 seconds researching the issue. I won't bother to provide links for you, which you could easily find yourself, and which you will ignore due to your obvious disinterest in the truth.

3. Why are you "sure" that the Church will receive a revelation in contravention of its current position? Are you trying to pretend that the revelation of 1978 allowing priesthood for all male members of the Church was a reversal of the Church's position? It wasn't. The Church's position had always been that the priesthood would someday be given to all. Members waited anxiously for that day to come, and most rejoiced when it did.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

November 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30